 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Archive for April, 2005
Saturday, April 30th, 2005
…if you look out the French doors in your kitchen and see a chicken waiting to come in.
Good grief.
I complained to my hubby about the ridiculous snail population in our neighborhood. If you walk across the lawn while there’s still dew on it, it’s like walking on eggshells. Crunch Crunch as you crush the hundreds of snails traversing the lawn on the way to my flower beds. They’re eating everything in sight. Hubby’s solution was to get up at the butt crack of dawn to drive an hour roundtrip to a feedstore to buy me a chicken.
A freakin’ chicken!
Our dog, which is about the same size as the chicken, just sniffed some butt and went on his merry way. The chicken, however, refuses to leave my doorway and tries to run into the house every chance it gets.
A freakin’ chicken! 
Posted in Life as I know it | 12 Comments »
Friday, April 29th, 2005
I asked this on the message board? Anybody want to play?
Don’t forget to add your blog while you’re there.
Yeah, and I blogged twice today. *g* What’s up with that?
Posted in Sites of Interest | No Comments »
Friday, April 29th, 2005
Holly Lisle is asking interested readers to pre-order her new book, because this will affect future deals offered to her. This is not a unique situation. I didn’t know this before I became a published author, but after I was offered my first contract certain things were explained to me, one of them being the importance of pre-orders. Unfortunately, I think most readers aren’t aware of this, so I’m going to tell you–If you want to support your authors, pre-order their books. That’s why the authors put those Amazon.com and BN.com pre-order links on their websites and say things like, “My book is available for pre-order now!”
Hint. Hint.
I failed to mention this when I explained the process of initial print runs. In addition to those orders made by booksellers after the pitch from the publisher marketing depts., the booksellers also track pre-orders on their websites. This gives them somewhat of an idea of reader interest in a particular book.
However, it seems to me that most readers wait until the book hits the shelves and then sometimes weeks pass before they pick up the book, even though they have every intention of doing so. Pre-ordering is good for both you and the author. You get the book delivered straight to your door (usually they ship before the actual release date, so you could get it on your porch before your local bookseller has it on their shelves) and the author benefits by the early interest shown in their book.
So… if you’ve got a book you know you’re going to buy when it comes out and it’s available for preorder, preorder it!! The author will thank you. 
Posted in Publication | 3 Comments »
Thursday, April 28th, 2005
I’m going through a big thing right now where I’m seriously evaluating my career choices. Maybe I’m approaching this whole author/writing/career thing all wrong. I need to decide, am I doing this for fun or am I doing this because I want to be successful? Because if I’m doing it for fun, than I need to just have fun. Right now I’m not. I’m stressing out over whether certain deals will help my career or harm it. If it was just about fun, wouldn’t that not matter? Why would I care? Write and sell. Thing is, I do care. A lot. I want to keep writing, but it will be harder for me to sell if I make bad choices.
It’s taken me two days of soul searching and a lot of stress. This is the part, I guess, where writing either becomes a business or it doesn’t. It’s a painful process. For me anyway.
Posted in Publication | 3 Comments »
Wednesday, April 27th, 2005
For those of you who may be interesed in GH scores, Sapphire’s Worth scored:
9, 8, 7.8, 9, 5 = 38.80
Top Quarter = 37.60
Surprising all around to me. I thought it would tank. The very first sentence has the heroine in bed with a man not the hero (and yes, they’re doing it). The 53-page entry also contained a 6-page mutual oral sex scene between the H/h. (Yep, 6 pages.) So I guess some of the judges like a little spice with their romance. 
Posted in Contests | 4 Comments »
Wednesday, April 27th, 2005
Hi.
I’ve been considering the purpose of my blog for weeks now, whether I wish to continue it or not. When I first mentioned this thought to Sasha she said, “Why are you thinking about getting rid of it?”. The answer is, it doesn’t have a focus. When I started the blog it was a way to document my road to publication, as many aspiring authors do. Then it became a place to network. In both instances it was a joy to me and the need to blog was an everyday, sometimes multiple times a day, urge. Before I bought my laptop, when I’d be on vacation I’d miss blogging so much. Nowadays, it’s more of something I sit down and check off my to do list. I think this shows in the blog itself and I’m very sorry about that. Also the idea of having a site that is more about my books and less about me is very appealing. I used to wonder at Lisa Kleypas’s site, which has no Contact page and until recently didn’t even have a mailing list. The only way to reach her was through the Avon Authors message board and through her agent. But now the idea of that kind of detachment seems really nice in a way.
However, since I have a couple blog skins in the works, now would not be the time to get rid of the blog. So you all will have to put up with me a little while longer. But for how much longer, I don’t know.
Posted in Life as I know it | 11 Comments »
Tuesday, April 26th, 2005
Alright. This topic has been beaten to death, but still I have to vent my anger and fear somewhere so my blog is as good a place as any. The last few weeks have really shocked me with the venom directed toward erotic romance. Loops, listservs, blog postings, the RITA fiasco. Now the RWR, where in a letter to the editor a writer says:
“Also we may want to stop prattling on about how ‘we just don’t get no respect’ when we allow dopey-looking hunks in ridiculous costumes advertising an erotic publisher
on our back cover. There’s a big difference between sensual romance and erotica, and I think we made a big mistake in lowering our standards to accept such a publisher.”
I get it. Some of you don’t like erotic romance. Fine. Whatever. Go ahead and complain. I don’t care. That is your right.
But here’s the deal. I don’t care. However, it appears my publishers may care and this frightens me.
First, you have Black Lace. My most recent letter from them says:
Editorial Changes: Please be aware that we want to tone down the four-letter words a bit for future compilations. We preferably want only one sex scene per story, beautifully described and perhaps more subtle than previous Black Lace writing. We are trying to get the books off the top shelf here in the UK, and out to a wider audience. For that, we need to reduce the use of ‘f’ and ‘c’ words.
There’s more, but you get the drift.
Then one of my other publishers recently turned down a collection from a friend of mine because the stories were “too erotic” for their “erotica” line.
Yesterday, a writer for still another of my publishers warned us on the loop that every ‘f’ word in her ms was cut, even when it was used as a curse and not a reference to the sexual act. When she complained she was told vitriolic reviewers had managed to change editorial policy for the publisher.
And Ghede never made it off the ground “due to the current conservative climate”.
What does this mean? Censorship. Plain and ‘f’ing simple. Publishers need to make money. Conseratives keep stirring the pot and publishers get scared. When my publishers get scared, so do I.
Is this because I can’t write any other way? Do I have to use four-letter words in my stories? Of course not. That’s not my point. My point is the option should exist for people to exercise their constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of speech and let’s face it people, it’s slowly eroding away in the case of erotic romance. Rumor has it EC is prepared to move their operation outside the US if this type of bullsh!t keeps up. It’s very, very ridiculous that people who don’t like something feel that they are superior enough to demean and suppress others rather than taking their @ss and the stick that’s shoved up it elsewhere. If you don’t like erotic romance, don’t read it. It’s just that simple. Just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean it should go away.
The publishers are feeling forced to change their guidelines due to pressure and it just isn’t right. This isn’t a case of them making changes because they want to. There should be something for everyone. There are inspirational publishers and imprints, and there are erotic publishers and imprints. Why are the erotic romance publishers facing all of this pressure? I just don’t understand it at all.
« Hide it
Posted in Rant | 27 Comments »
|
|
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|